Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Taxes

The tax code for U.S. corporations contains some peculiarities that the general public hardly knows about. Henkel[1] added that if profits are made by these companies but earned abroad, and the money, as cash, is not returned to the United States, it cannot be taxed in the U.S. system. This is an invitation for internationally active companies to use this legal loophole and stash their profits abroad; thereby reducing tax revenue in the United States.
Regulations do not come more peculiar than this incentive to move production to Europe or the Far East. In fact, regional offices of U.S. corporations are mushrooming overseas – in Ireland, Great Britain, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and Singapore. The arguments of the defenders of this policy are oddly alienating; they promote business outside the United States, which is detrimental to the U.S. economy and, therefore, the American people. Allan Sloane, a reporter for Fortune magazine, wrote in 2014 how U.S. corporations buy companies in Europe and move their headquarters there to avoid paying U.S. taxes. These moves are called “inversions.”[2]
In my view, U.S. tax laws favor large U.S. corporations in contrast to small or medium-sized companies and individual citizens. Companies with branches around the globe are taxed for their U.S. profit only. But, U.S. citizens living abroad are taxed around the globe for their income. Why the difference? Is it based on powerful and influential lobbying in Washington that only corporations can afford? 
According to Jilani,[3] thirty U.S. corporations from 2008 to 2010 spent more on lobbying than what they paid in income taxes. 


[1] Christiane H. Henkel, “US Konzerne horten Geld” [US Corporations Hoard Cash], Neue Zürcher Zeitung, October 11, 2011.
[2]   Allan Sloan, “Positively un-American Tax Dodges”, Fortune, July 7, 2014
[3]   Zaid Jilani, “Between 2008 And 2010, 30 Big Corporations Spent More Lobbying Washington Than They Paid In Income Taxes,Think Progress Economy, December 7, 2011, (with full list of these companies).

No comments:

Post a Comment